<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: First usability release is coming up soon.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techblog.wikimedia.org/2009/06/first-usability-release-is-coming-up-soon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techblog.wikimedia.org/2009/06/first-usability-release-is-coming-up-soon/</link>
	<description>Technical Information for the Wikimedia Projects.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 17:09:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Database</title>
		<link>http://techblog.wikimedia.org/2009/06/first-usability-release-is-coming-up-soon/comment-page-1/#comment-135</link>
		<dc:creator>Database</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 11:38:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techblog.wikimedia.org/?p=216#comment-135</guid>
		<description>Okay, that looks very, very nice. I love the new sidebar and tabs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, that looks very, very nice. I love the new sidebar and tabs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick J</title>
		<link>http://techblog.wikimedia.org/2009/06/first-usability-release-is-coming-up-soon/comment-page-1/#comment-133</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 01:54:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techblog.wikimedia.org/?p=216#comment-133</guid>
		<description>My 2 cents: The tabs are nice and look great, go with it! The edit toolbar hiding is nice. I&#039;m only unsure whether highlighting a word then clicking bold, and then highlighting the same word and clicking bold again, should remove the bolding, rather than adding the bolding twice. I have concerns about search results though, and wonder if they could be simplified further. Why does a non-technical user (or most users) care about this line: &quot;12 KB (1833 words) - 02:50, 30 April 2009&quot;? Perhaps this line could be removed? Also the space is not used very efficiently in the search results: compare a Google search for &quot;test&quot; versus a search on the prototype site for &quot;test&quot;. The Google results have 10 results (on my screen) with 2 lines max text each, in a smaller font, and &quot;feels right&quot; to me. The prototype results have 8 results, some with 3 lines of text each, in a larger font. So suggest showing more results on the page, with max 2 lines of excerpted contents, and a slightly smaller font. Also the Google results don&#039;t include HTML tags, but the prototype results do include wiki tags/braces/markup/etc, which most users do not want to see. But please understand that this is not intended in any way to discourage you - improvement in the layout of the search results is badly needed, I just want it to go even further! :-)
-- All the best,
Nick.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My 2 cents: The tabs are nice and look great, go with it! The edit toolbar hiding is nice. I&#8217;m only unsure whether highlighting a word then clicking bold, and then highlighting the same word and clicking bold again, should remove the bolding, rather than adding the bolding twice. I have concerns about search results though, and wonder if they could be simplified further. Why does a non-technical user (or most users) care about this line: &#8220;12 KB (1833 words) &#8211; 02:50, 30 April 2009&#8243;? Perhaps this line could be removed? Also the space is not used very efficiently in the search results: compare a Google search for &#8220;test&#8221; versus a search on the prototype site for &#8220;test&#8221;. The Google results have 10 results (on my screen) with 2 lines max text each, in a smaller font, and &#8220;feels right&#8221; to me. The prototype results have 8 results, some with 3 lines of text each, in a larger font. So suggest showing more results on the page, with max 2 lines of excerpted contents, and a slightly smaller font. Also the Google results don&#8217;t include HTML tags, but the prototype results do include wiki tags/braces/markup/etc, which most users do not want to see. But please understand that this is not intended in any way to discourage you &#8211; improvement in the layout of the search results is badly needed, I just want it to go even further! :-)<br />
&#8211; All the best,<br />
Nick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nihiltres</title>
		<link>http://techblog.wikimedia.org/2009/06/first-usability-release-is-coming-up-soon/comment-page-1/#comment-126</link>
		<dc:creator>Nihiltres</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 22:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techblog.wikimedia.org/?p=216#comment-126</guid>
		<description>This is good news. I&#039;m looking forward to testing the new skin in a more &quot;live&quot; way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is good news. I&#8217;m looking forward to testing the new skin in a more &#8220;live&#8221; way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
